TikTok ban went before the Supreme Court — here's what happened
TikTok's lawyer danced around the question but said there is no precedent for a foreign government being subject to U.S. free speech laws. He then used a series of analogies, and it didn't seem like the Supreme Court judges were impressed by his answer.
Alternet on MSN16h
'Bizarre' argument from TikTok’s attorney highlights why SCOTUS ruled 9-0 against companyIn an unanimous ruling handed down on Friday morning, January 17 in TikTok v. Merrick B. Garland, the U.S. Supreme Court ...
Noel Francisco, representing TikTok and ByteDance, argued that Supreme Court endorsement of this law could enable statutes targeting other companies on similar grounds. "AMC movie theaters used ...
7dOpinion
The Supreme Court seems skeptical of the Chinese-owned platform’s First Amendment claim.
The Supreme Court is hearing an appeal against a law that bans the video-sharing app in the country unless it is sold.
The first, Noel J. Francisco, who represents ByteDance, is a prominent conservative litigator who is now a partner at the Jones Day law firm. A graduate of the University of Chicago Law School, Mr.
"We go dark. Essentially, the platform shuts down," TikTok lawyer Noel Francisco told the Supreme Court last week. The company also plans to give users an option to download all their data so ...
an attorney for TikTok, Noel Francisco, told the Supreme Court on Friday that he expects that if the law is upheld, the app would "go dark - essentially, the platform shuts down," when the ...
Chief Justice John Roberts convened the court for arguments in TikTok's challenge. Noel Francisco, who is arguing on behalf of the platform, will present TikTok's case first. He has two ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback