On November 13, 2025, the Oregon Court of Appeals published Seabold Construction Co., Inc. v. KOZ 2211 SW 4th Avenue, LLC, 344 Or App 688 (2025)—a decision that could signal the death knell for ...
On a great many occasions, I’ve seen the two causes of action in the title, Unjust Enrichment and Quantum Meruit, spoken in the same breath, as if they are either one in the same or so closely related ...
Sousou Connect Limited v Abel: oral capital introduction agreements and the limits of quantum meruit
A High Court ruling dismisses a €1.5 million claim for capital introduction fees, finding no concluded oral agreement.
Douglas J. Nash, a partner at Hiscock & Barclay, and Gabriel M. Nugent, an associate at the firm, write that commercial litigators often know quantum meruit as a cause of action pleaded as an ...
"Here, Dyess asked for simple money damages via a quantum meruit claim, which courts of law have historically enforced," Judge David J. Richman wrote on behalf of the three-judge panel. "We conclude ...
They’re sorta like contracts, but not quite. “Consideration” in turn, means that one thing of value is exchanged for another thing of value. I give you money and you give me your car. “Capacity” means ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results